News
Medical Devices
[11/10]
African researchers plan malaria vaccine trial
[11/10]
Music headphones can interfere with heart devices
[11/04]
Fresenius Medical Care 3Q net profit up 14 percent
Personal Injury
[11/20]
Dog hits controls, drives van into coffee house
[11/18]
Maine man sheds 140 pounds to join the Marines
[11/12]
W.Va. man beats health insurer in court over $40
Top Headlines
[11/21]
Gov't: AG gets clean bill of health after collapse
[11/21]
Congress sends jobless benefit extension to Bush
[11/21]
Lawyers attack prosecutor who had Cheney indicted
Tort
[11/20]
Dog hits controls, drives van into coffee house
[11/18]
Maine man sheds 140 pounds to join the Marines
[11/12]
W.Va. man beats health insurer in court over $40
Case Summaries
Injury & Tort Law
[11/19]
McDonald v. Sun Oil Co.
In a suit arising out of the sale of a property containing a disused mercury mine, alleging negligence, contribution, breach of contract and fraud as a result of an alleged oral warranty that certain rock at the mine was free of mercury, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the state statute of repose did not render the negligence claim time-barred, because provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act amending state statute of limitations rules also applied to statutes of repose; 2) the contribution claim could not be brought without remedial action having been initiated by a state environmental agency; 3) the parol evidence rule was properly applied to find that the parties had reduced their entire agreement to writing and that no binding oral warranty existed; and 4) plaintiffs did not produce evidence of the alleged falsity of statements made by defendant.
[11/19]
Bregin v. Liquidebt Sys., Inc
In a suit alleging retaliatory discharge and tortious interference with employment, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff did not identify any illegal acts which he was asked to commit, for which a retaliation claim could be brought; 2) state law did not provide a whistleblower exception to the employment-at-will doctrine; and 3) plaintiff did not make out a claim for tortious interference.
[11/17]
Goldstein v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles
In a claim alleging that defendants wrongfully obtained plaintiff's conviction for murder based on their pattern and practice of misusing the testimony of jailhouse informants, grant of plaintiff's Penal Code section 924.2 petition seeking access to grand jury materials is reversed where California courts do not have a broad inherent power to order disclosure of grand jury materials to private litigants.